On September 10th,
2013, Anahad O’Connor posted an article on New York Times about how eating
breakfast has an effect of whether people may gain weight or not. He talks
about how people skip breakfast in order to lost weight. In actuality, it
causes people to not lose but stay the same or even gain weight. Why? He says
that if people skip breakfast, they get hungry throughout the day and snack on
a lot of things and eat much more than they would have if they had eaten
breakfast. However, he mentions many contradictions that other researchers have
point out, which was that breakfast might actually help people lose weight.
The author is credible because he uses actual facts that
he had researched. For example, he uses Dr. Allison as a source and quotes many
of the things that he claims about eating breakfast. In the article, as one of
the contradictions, the author mentions that Dr. Allison said “But of 72 subsequent research articles on breakfast and
weight loss that cited the registry study, about half overstated its findings”.
Several
things mentioned in the article are out of context. For example it states that,
“…then measured the effect on their body weight was published in 1992”. This is
out of context because it mentions a trial that was published in 1992. Those
trial results could be completely different compared to if that trial was
redone in 2013. Basing other results on the trial in 1992 is inaccurate and the
outcomes would be misleading.
The
author purpose of this article was to show two different sides of whether
breakfast was a necessity or not. It wasn’t to argue a side but to analyze
different views of eating breakfast.
The
audience for whom the article was meant for would probably be towards people in
general who care for their health and want to know ways in which they can be
healthy. Since the article is not fighting for one side, it is a more
informational piece. Therefore it is intended towards people who want to know
which route is the right way to go.
The
author uses personification in his article to achieve his purpose, which is
emphasizing several points. For example he says, “…their findings drowned out
by dozens of large observational studies that have found associations between
breakfast habits and obesity but no direct cause and effect”. The large
observational studies didn’t actually “drown” the findings. What he meant was
that the observational studies overpowered the other findings. The studies were
better than the findings that the findings are ignored for that reason.
The
author achieved his purpose because he used factual evidence from actual
scientists who are reliable sources for his article. He showed both sides of an
opinion in order to show the possible doubts of a thought. He uses rhetoric,
like personification to show emphasis in what he is trying to say. As these
examples of his strategies show, Anahad
O’Connor accomplished his purpose.
http://well.blogs.nytimes.com/2013/09/10/myths-surround-breakfast-and-weight/?ref=health&_r=1
http://well.blogs.nytimes.com/2013/09/10/myths-surround-breakfast-and-weight/?ref=health&_r=1
A Stolen Life by Jaycee Lee Dugard
This book is about a girl named Jaycee Lee Dugard who write about her experience as an 11-year-old abducted and imprisoned for 18 years. I chose this book because I have always heard stories about little children being kidnapped and were never found. But this girl survived all those years and was able to retell her story of how she remembered it. I have always wanted to know what really happens to children who get kidnapped. I would always hear that a child was killed. So no one would be able to hear the child's story.
I am looking forward to be able to feel the feelings that she felt and put myself in her shoes to get a better feel of the story. What I hope to gain is the truth. I want to know if crazy things do happened to kidnapped children like movies portray, or if it is all exaggerated and kidnapping isn't as "exciting" as it seems. I am very excited to read this book!
No comments:
Post a Comment